Psychological apocalypse. Maybe I should explain that one a little more. It’s actually kind of a democratic process. (How can an individual psyche be subject to a democratic process?) [schizophrenic multiple personality disorder?] (Hmmm… we’ll examine that later.) So, here is a typical excerpt of a couple of my “personalities” dukeing it out over whether or not oust an idea. X and O will noodle and debate until it is determined whether or not there is opportunity for further thought on this subject. If the potential for further thought or debate is exhausted, it’ll get chucked. If there are still good questions left unanswered, it stays.
O: Aliens do exist, you know. I’m not saying this in a paranoid, government conspiracy revealed, kind of a way; nor in a wake and bake, Trek-e-freak, “They’re really out there, man!” way either. I’m just looking at the odds. Our sun is a star. It has nine planets which it holds in orbit. Of those nine planets, one (arguably two) can support life. There are billions of other stars in our galaxy and billions of galaxies in the universe. What are the odds that of the billions of billions of other stars out there, not one has a planet orbiting it that can support life?
Okay, so jumping way ahead and making, like, 60 different assumptions, lets pretend that some of that life periodically checks out our little planet. How would they be able to tell that there is intelligent life here?
X: We build things.
O: So do beavers. Do we consider them “intelligent”?
X: We use tools.
O: So do monkeys in South America.
X: We have social organization.
O: So do bees and ants.
X: We communicate.
O: Which differentiates us from all other animals in what way?
X: We have weapons of mass destruction.
O: Right. We’re looking for signs of
intelligence here. Heh heh. Most animals fight. Animals kill for three reasons: hunger, fear (i.e. self-defense or fear of losing territory), and insanity. I don’t think we’re any different. In fact I’m not sure you can really make a solid argument that differentiates us from the rest of the animal kingdom.
X: Love. We have love.
O: For example?
X: We love our children.
O: Instinct. Lots of animals care for their children and are even willing to die for them. Prove to me that there’s a difference between that and human love.
X: What about faith? We have religion.
O: Ah, Yes. Religion. From a pantheistic perspective, I would assert that religion has done a fantastic job of destroying faith… and it is precisely because animals have no religion, that they are closer to God than we.
X: Explain.
O: Religion (or Christianity at least), as we know it today, is largely concerned with morals. Animals don’t get hung up on morals.
X: What’s wrong with morality?
O: Well, nothing; except that morality has nothing to do with God.
X: What!?!
O: According to the Bible, what was the event that signaled humanities fall from grace?
X: Eve ate the apple.
O: Right, and the Bible says that God knew she had eaten the apple when he saw that Adam and Eve had clothed themselves. Did you ever wonder why they did that?
X: I don’t have to wonder. The Bible says they realized they were naked and felt shame, so they clothed themselves.
O: Ah! So, they ate from the Tree of Knowledge and felt shame for their nakedness. What “knowledge” do you suppose they gained that would make them feel shame?
X: ??
O: What is shame?
X: Embarrassment, humility… feeling that you have done wrong…
O: Yes. All of those things. And what unique circumstance must exist in order for anyone to feel embarrassed or humiliated?
X: ??
O: Are you embarrassed to be naked when you’re alone?
X: No.
O: And if you were always completely alone what “wrong” could you do?
X: ??
O: So, in order for one to feel shame, another must be involved.
X: Yyyess.
O: Good answer. So the “knowledge” that Adam and Eve gained by eating the apple was a knowledge of themselves as individuals. And, in differentiating self from other, they felt shame at their own nakedness in front of another.
X: So?
O: Sssoooo… covering themselves was the first self-conscious act of humanity. Perhaps, prior to that, we, as a species, did not understand that there was a difference between our selves and the whole of creation. And so, after that first realization, and still to this day, it is our notion of separateness that is our sin. And it is separateness that necessitates morality. Sane individuals do not intentionally wrong themselves. If we considered that we are in fact one with everything, morality would be moot. Ergo, “religion” (specifically Christianity), in focusing on the moot, has detracted attention away from truly seeking God (oneness). Thus my previous assertion that religion has wrecked faith.
X: Define your terms.
O: God is the sum of all things. Faith is belief in something (In this case, God).
X: Then it’s not our faith that religion has wrecked, it’s our God.
O: Well said.
X: Wait, back up. God is the sum of all things.
O: Yes.
X: God is this desk?
O: No. God is that which makes the desk a desk.
X: Particle board?
O: no. Lets say you have a bridge made of stones. What is it that makes the bridge?
X: er… stones?
O: [bonk] Thank you. I’ll rephrase. What makes the bridge a bridge and not a pile of rocks?
X: It’s shape?
O: Bingo. There are laws of physics which a bridge must adhere to in order to be a bridge. If it fails to adhere to any one of those laws, the law of gravity will make it a pile of rocks and not a bridge. All of those laws and forces that make a bridge a bridge are the essence of the thing. The sum of the essences of all things is God.
X: What does this have to do with aliens?
O: … I forget, focus.
X: So what are the laws and forces that make human, human?
O: A fine question. Damn fine. I guess we’ll have to keep this one. Oh, aliens… the point was that we’re animals. There isn’t much that differentiates us from the rest of the animal kingdom, and if we don’t think that animals are intelligent, we had better scrutinize ourselves a little closer.
X: I thought the argument was there isn’t anything that differentiates us from anything at all?
O: Too right.
X: We have math.
O: Oooohh…. Uh….. … Yeah, this one definitely stays.